The nice thing here is the snipe should be predictable for each model and allow users to plan accordingly. What we do takes so much time as it is, no one pays us to do this, we do it with volunteers and samples. Last place was the Triton that averaged just over 3 hundredths of an inch deviation. Have you seen this? Mark That really wasnt the point of the article. Todd, I am OK with your releasing my email address to Jim if he would like to ask any questions. Edwin Havent seen/tried them. Wish we could offer more, but its just not feasible. While were not ranking this category we do feel the data is interesting and informative.
You seem to have some electrical engineering knowledge. Luke All of these planers definitely pull some amps at times and running them on the same circuit as a dust collector may be problematic regardless of which you choose. Also, the more we do these the more some folks comment about how they would weigh different categories differently. Does a 92 lb planer perform better or worse than 58 lbs? Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. Thats all great feedback, ultimately we need to come up with a winner (our winner) but each of you can take the data weve presented and weigh the results differently to best match your needs and come up with your own winner.
That video claims in the manual that the gap you saw in the out feed table to the mid table is supposed to be that way. Should be of course mentioned as a advantage of this unit, but not for overall comparison purposes. Hey Todd, What a valuable guide on thickness planer. document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Like any tool, consumables are another topic all onto themselves. We reach out to as many manufacturers as we can when we do these evaluations. You can buy the X with it online,, just type in with stand in your Google search. Everywhere I look it shows the Ridgid R4331 as being a part of their lifetime warranty but your chart shows a 3-year limited warranty.
planer ryobi thicknesser bunnings tools 1500w bench tool power wood nz thicknessers cordless warehouse woodworking thickness planner stackable boxes ap13 Interesting question. Do you happen to know if this is an updated version of the same model?
As you can see above, the DEWALT DW734 performed the best with an average deviation from 3/32 of just under 2 one-thousandths of an inch. I personally dont think speed 2 is an advantage, I think on speed 1 we would have seen even better results. In my experience with the 735, it generally works fine as the only tool on a 20A circuit, but it will occasionally trip the CB. I want and can afford the DeWalt 635, but the weight issue for me is huge!!! Further yet, run each side, one at a time and compare rigidity of the cutterhead and accuracy. Finishing with the best price is the Porter-Cable PC305PT at $320 and rounding up the most expensive is the Makita 2012NB at $650. All of the units had a similar table adjustment but one. Have you tried reaching out to customer service?
It looks like they are offering a sale right now. Curious if you found any significance of machine weight? The four setscrews were easy to reach and we found it easy to dial in the proper adjustments. Even though I am lucky to have a 20A circuit, the dust collection would certainly be running on that circuit as well. Many guys ask us about that, but were not a testing company, we dont have the tools, resources or time to do long term testing. I dont believe Makita should be that far down the list from its performance though. I hope this might help. In his capacity at United he oversees the Residential and Commercial Building Division along with all Design-Build projects.He is also the editor of Home Construction & Improvement. I cannot install a centralized dust collection system with my setup. Before building my flip top cart, I thought about purchasing a fold-up Ridgid miter saw cart.
I have just looked at your planer review and I did not see any tests for cutterhead paralleladigitty or dust collection compatibility and performance. Also running on speed 2 will need more power (Amps) so this also should be taken in to consideration. Most of the planers utilize a bolt to adjust the table vertically with a captured nut to hold the adjustment bolt in place. By clicking on 'Accept' or continuing to use this website, you agree that cookies can be placed. These need high volume dust collection to keep up with the massive amount of chips. But in this comparison, maybe I missed out something correct me then, you did not mention that DW735 has to speed gear and that is the reason for better finish of the surface. My only complaint is that the blades nick easily, but even so, Im happy with the machine. shopee thicknesser planer thickness dewalt makita dw735 benchtop So, number one, research what you need for appropriate dust collection (a shop vac is almost certainly not adequate and wont be getting the fines), hire an electrician, and run the circuit you need for the dust collection. Two things that Id most like to see added to any future comparisons (of planers or any other tools) would be 1) some kind of likely longevity analysis, perhaps based on differences like plastic versus metal gears and 2) the cost of replacement parts, especially those parts that are mostly likely to need to be replaced. Were not going to rank this category as we feel a bench-top shop tool like this will always require some setup and fine tuning. Whats important in the data is the relative measurements. Its extremely important that the in-feed and out-feed tables are level in order to have consistent and representative tests. I noticed that for the Triton planer, your picture differs from the stock photo (on/off switch, for example). Benchtop thickness planers are an essential piece of equipment for any woodshop. It is basically a huge router on its side and sounds like one.but louder. The top three included the DEWALT 735X, Triton TPT125 and the Delta 22-590. It points to the much more powerful motor in that unit. However, we did provide information from that category as we feel its valuable to some readers. neweek planer raboteuse cepilladoras electricas tradewheel
We applied blue chalk to the surface to highlight the milling marks, and scallops, for a visual inspection.
Be aware that there is a difference between a vacuum with filtration to capture fines and one that moves enough air to collect them from the tool. Excellent job! The DEWALT DW735X was by far the best finish of all the samples we planed. Maybe one day well do an update an include them.
The wood samples we used in this test were 14 Mahogany decking, 1 x 8 Poplar, 16 Oak and 16 Maple. Hey Jim & Todd, Although I do not have the need to move my DW735x from one site to another, I have mounted it on a plywood rolling flip top cart which allows me to use either the planer or my Ridgid Oscillating Sander which are both housed in that same cart. asist hoblovka protahem cz b26r euronics 254mm Eric Theres just no way for us to realistically do that. | Disclaimer & Privacy Policy Tool Box Buzz is a Trademark of Tool Box Buzz, LLC Visit Our Partner Sites. Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. It appears that all these units are equipped with 15 Amp, 110/120V single phase motors and the graph clearly indicates that some of them are going into high over load, particularly the DW735 at continuous 213% for the time it was dealing with the poplar. Am I right that all of the testing that you presented used the faster feed rate so that you could compare apples to apples between the brands? Would be interested on how the planner below would rank in your test, King Canada KC-13HPC 13 Planer with Helical Cutter Head $699.99 Amazon.ca. Julian Thanks for the nice compliment and for taking the time to post a comment. This wasnt a surprise to us as several of us have used this planer for quite some time and its really the best benchtop thickness planer on the market without a doubt.
Luke, Im a hobbyist on the threshold of making it (furniture building) a job. I have searched and do not see any images online that represent the one you worked with. A lot of good information, succinctly presented. Im not affiliated with them. You need a bunch of passes compared to a stationary planer, but that is true for all of the lunch box planers. David W. planer benchtop thickness power inch powertec tools delta Jim Ive only seen guys store them in the trailer and carry them and set them on a work table at the job. Hi Todd, I was referring to your chart showing the ammeter readings: https://www.toolboxbuzz.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Planer-Amp-Readings.png. You might check to see if thats correct as its likely true for the 735x as well. Bench-top thickness planers have a dial used to move the cutting heads up and down to set the depth of cut. Our team set up a FLUKE 3001 FC recording ammeter that measured values on a one second interval and sent the data via wireless link to our computer for later analysis. Here we are again trying to rank the tools in our Head-to-Head and give you a winner. That means a dedicated cart for it, and that means giving up a signif bit of floorspace in a crowded shop, for a machine that gets very occasional use.
For additional information please visit our additional disclosure policies. I noticed that Dewalt makes no differentiation in setup between hardwood and softwood. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. Just curious, since the Triton rated higher than the Dewalt 734, why do you consider the Dewalt a better planer? We also wanted to see how the different hardwoods would exercise the planer capacity. During this test, we set each planer to its maximum depth of cut (as recommended by the manufacturer) usually 3/32 inch. I reached out to their support and clarified the warranty terms. . Dewalt definitely has the thickness planner worth getting right now. My advice, you can run a 12 through on each side, at the same time, to truly see paralleladiggity to the platen. While ranking the warranties might seem simple, weve decided to just list them rather than rank them. Am I missing something? I use this with my Dewalt 735 (to tie to the discussion here) and a 14 bandsaw. The reality is a user might change blades once or twice a year (twice would be heavy use) so the difference from 11 to 25 doesnt seem enough to warrant why you might buy one over another model. Some choose to participate, some do not. thicknesser planer It is very well thought out and informative and provides me a good basis to compare between planers. My space is multi-functional and has to be setup each time to work. Best of all, you provided us with the results so that we can decide what priorities to assess our purchase with. To do this, we adjusted each planers depth until it contacted the wood but had not reached the depth where the cutter blades hit the wood. To me the amp trace says to reduce the cut depth a bit to bring the amp loads down, particularly if you do experience an overload. wen planer thickness benchtop blade inch zoom planers bench wood thicknesser portable planer bench blades 1500w lumberjack 240v It has 12 wheels and can be easily set up and taken down by one person. Were those amps on the y-axis? planer This is likely attributed to the powerful motor and excellent blades. . Coming in 2nd place was the Triton TPT125 followed by the Ridgid R4331 in third place. This just gives a good relative comparison of how the motors performed under load. planer 1500w cepillo 1800w vevor 15a mophorn benchtop 15amp 5inch regrueso einhell planers 2pcs machineatlas
Same Question, except Ridgid v. Dewalt 734. However, with all the planers having relatively the same amount of snipe were not ranking this category either but rather letting you see how they all compared. We also evaluated the smoothness by simply feeling the surfaces. grizzly planer benchtop dust industrial planers built announce excited inch I have spectacular results with the Dewalt 735. Another consideration when evaluating bench-top thickness planer performance is the surface finish.
The DEWALT DW735X came in second with just over 4 one-thousandths of an inch followed by Ridgid R4331 at just over 5 one-thousandths of an inch. Did you test whether the planers, especially the 735x can actually handle the full widths they claim? Hi Todd, In my initial comments about my DW735, I failed to mention that I purchased as a used unit. The real question will be do you have a separate dedicated circuit, because if you run this on the same circuit as your dust collection Im certain that will be a problem. The length of snipe on all the models we tested nearly mimic this distance. For our testing we chose the following planers (follow links for manufacturers page on each planer): For this head-to-head test we focused on planing several different wood species, the surface finish, the power, and pricing. Sean Have to look VERY closely at the RIDGID warranty website, different tools have different coverages.
Youll need to evaluate the details to determine whether it meets your needs. In my case, I installed a 20A 240V circuit and purchased a Gyro Air G700 as it fit in a small space. In my circumstance, where this is a hobby and Im not churning out large amounts of wood here, will the benefits of the 735 be as pronounced over the 734? For more information, check out our, https://www.ridgid.com/us/en/3-year-limited-warranty, https://www.toolboxbuzz.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Planer-Amp-Readings.png. What did surprise us was the 2nd and 3rd place finishes of the Triton TPT125 and the Ridgid R4331. One thing about this collector: The impeller is at the inlet, ahead of any cyclone, so make sure never to use it as a floor collector or in other situations where I might suck up chunks rather than dust. While all the planers produced a smooth finish to the touch, there was quite a variation of smoothness resulting from the milling marks and scallops. there was some solid objectivity in evaluating the tool. Good luck. High amp overload and heat are not good for electric motors. Just has a better fit and finish. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. Peter. I havent ever tripped it on a dedicated 20 amp circuit. With planers I always try to take small bites regardless of the wood species, and see how the planer reacts. Do you have any idea how the DeWalt could actually operate at that load without tripping a 20A 120V circuit? Oh, and I dont usually use the fine setting on the Dewalt.
The power difference was clear during the planing operations as it didnt seem to care what we ran through it. Copyright 2009-2022 Tool Box Buzz, LLC All Rights Reserved. We didnt try to max out width, but I can tell you from my own experience with the 735x that it does very well even on wider boards. But every machine is capable of planing boards 12 to 13 inches wide and 6 inches tall. Many of the products that we review are provided to us for free by a manufacturer or retailer. The DEWALT 735X and the Triton TPT125 were able to keep the feed rate much closer to the no-load rate compared to the rest of the field. My Hilt shows its a 9A vacuum rated at 20A with a tool, which gives 11A to a tool before exceeding the 20A capacity. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. Do you have an opinion on the JET brand of portable planers? Clearly the heavier machines have heavier parts, likely has less vibration resulting in a better user experience. I already knew that the DW735 is a good machine, but you pointed out some features that make me more comfortable with my decision. I think speed 2 should be not used in testing procedure. These cookies do not store any personal information. Weight and size are always an important factor in small shops. The Makita is a very well-built planer with some nice features but the price wasnt as competitive and the surface finish, at least on the materials we tested, wasnt nearly as good as some of the other models. The graphic above shows the no-load feed rate for each machine along with the feed rates of each machine for each sample of wood. planer alitools thicknesser Ed The test was performed on the higher speed. I do have some JET tools in my woodshop and they are very nice. I am about to purchase the DEWALT DW735X, as you mentioned. What are you running for dust collection? Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. Im a newbie setting up my shop and Im trying to stretch my dollars. Thickness planers produce high volumes of wood chips and dust, probably more so than most any other tool in the woodshop. Luke, my situation is similar. Your own testing rated the Triton better. Between the milling marks and scallops the board could require more or less sanding to create a finished surface that will take paint, stain or clear finish well. planer benchtop planers Nice review. Question were all depth of cut settings for each machine the same for each specified material (was each machine doing an equivalent amount of work) . As you can see above the times required to change the blades on the planers varied from just over 11 minutes to just over 25 minutes. planer I appreciate you guys noting that weight issue. For each planer, we ran this test three times and used the average of these times for a comparison between the no-load and fully loaded feed rates of each machine. In some cases, we also have advertising or affiliate relationships with manufacturers and retailers of products and services we review. I would argue fit and finish is huge, and its not something that shows up when looking at general specs. neweek tradewheel Is it easy or difficult to change out the blades on any given machine? Hey Todd, is there anyone out there who has a good field set up for the 735X? Certainly could reduce that amp draw with a thinner cut, but in that test we were purposely putting all the planers on a high demand application by taking the thickest cut they recommend. Thanks! I am seeking a planer and since it will end up in an off-grid location powered by solar and generator for long jobs, the power requirements are important. If youre looking for a good performing affordable planer the Triton is certainly worth noting. The as-shipped accuracy of the tables varied between the different models.We adjusted the in-feed and out-feed tables separately and then checked for level across the entire machine. I ask because it seems that your personal recommendations do not necessarily align with the score rankings. It is like the feed rollers become to stiff. Anyway, hope this helps. I cant personally speak for it. We tested how much material would be lost to snipe. As a result of the rotational blade movement, small bite size chunks are removed as each blade contacts the surface, resulting in very slight ridges that can be left on the surface of the planed board (often referred to as milling marks). The power draw at this time was 32AX115VX0.85PF=3128W or 4.2HP. Below is a detailed discussion of our testing and evaluation. This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. In particular, we adjusted the in-feed and out-feed tables to ensure each were level with the planer bed. Its likely the #12 wire we used for the current tranformer probe, that probably should have been a #10 wire. PowerTools AirTools HandTools Measuring&Layout CordlessTools Automotive Lawn&Garden, Home Latest Tool Reviews Head-To-Head Best Benchtop Thickness Planer Head-to-Head, March 17, 2019By Todd Fratzel on Head-To-Head, Thickness Planer. So its possible some were cutting a deeper cut than others. We do not go back and add more tools. Users of the DEWALT DW735X will ultimately waste more material over the life of the planer. Thickness planers allow users to purchase a wider range of raw wood materials (often at cheaper prices) and mill the wood to the exact dimensions needed for a project. Ultimately, warranties can be a tough issue, and how easily you can get warranty service is likely to be as important as how many years the coverage is. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. We realize there is a value proposition that many will look at, but that will factor into our overall ranking when price and the other categories are combined. While we didnt rank dust collection its worth discussing briefly. Great comparison review, and I appreciate you sharing the differences for categories that you did not include in the scoring, because it lets us add those back in to see what the revised score would have been if the category was ranked, or we can assign weighting to certain categories and see the ranking change considerably as well. When you evaluated the price, it would have been nice if you had listed prices for replacement blades.
You seem to have some electrical engineering knowledge. Luke All of these planers definitely pull some amps at times and running them on the same circuit as a dust collector may be problematic regardless of which you choose. Also, the more we do these the more some folks comment about how they would weigh different categories differently. Does a 92 lb planer perform better or worse than 58 lbs? Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. Thats all great feedback, ultimately we need to come up with a winner (our winner) but each of you can take the data weve presented and weigh the results differently to best match your needs and come up with your own winner.
planer ryobi thicknesser bunnings tools 1500w bench tool power wood nz thicknessers cordless warehouse woodworking thickness planner stackable boxes ap13 Interesting question. Do you happen to know if this is an updated version of the same model?
As you can see above, the DEWALT DW734 performed the best with an average deviation from 3/32 of just under 2 one-thousandths of an inch. I personally dont think speed 2 is an advantage, I think on speed 1 we would have seen even better results. In my experience with the 735, it generally works fine as the only tool on a 20A circuit, but it will occasionally trip the CB. I want and can afford the DeWalt 635, but the weight issue for me is huge!!! Further yet, run each side, one at a time and compare rigidity of the cutterhead and accuracy. Finishing with the best price is the Porter-Cable PC305PT at $320 and rounding up the most expensive is the Makita 2012NB at $650. All of the units had a similar table adjustment but one. Have you tried reaching out to customer service? It looks like they are offering a sale right now. Curious if you found any significance of machine weight? The four setscrews were easy to reach and we found it easy to dial in the proper adjustments. Even though I am lucky to have a 20A circuit, the dust collection would certainly be running on that circuit as well. Many guys ask us about that, but were not a testing company, we dont have the tools, resources or time to do long term testing. I dont believe Makita should be that far down the list from its performance though. I hope this might help. In his capacity at United he oversees the Residential and Commercial Building Division along with all Design-Build projects.He is also the editor of Home Construction & Improvement. I cannot install a centralized dust collection system with my setup. Before building my flip top cart, I thought about purchasing a fold-up Ridgid miter saw cart.
I have just looked at your planer review and I did not see any tests for cutterhead paralleladigitty or dust collection compatibility and performance. Also running on speed 2 will need more power (Amps) so this also should be taken in to consideration. Most of the planers utilize a bolt to adjust the table vertically with a captured nut to hold the adjustment bolt in place. By clicking on 'Accept' or continuing to use this website, you agree that cookies can be placed. These need high volume dust collection to keep up with the massive amount of chips. But in this comparison, maybe I missed out something correct me then, you did not mention that DW735 has to speed gear and that is the reason for better finish of the surface. My only complaint is that the blades nick easily, but even so, Im happy with the machine. shopee thicknesser planer thickness dewalt makita dw735 benchtop So, number one, research what you need for appropriate dust collection (a shop vac is almost certainly not adequate and wont be getting the fines), hire an electrician, and run the circuit you need for the dust collection. Two things that Id most like to see added to any future comparisons (of planers or any other tools) would be 1) some kind of likely longevity analysis, perhaps based on differences like plastic versus metal gears and 2) the cost of replacement parts, especially those parts that are mostly likely to need to be replaced. Were not going to rank this category as we feel a bench-top shop tool like this will always require some setup and fine tuning. Whats important in the data is the relative measurements. Its extremely important that the in-feed and out-feed tables are level in order to have consistent and representative tests. I noticed that for the Triton planer, your picture differs from the stock photo (on/off switch, for example). Benchtop thickness planers are an essential piece of equipment for any woodshop. It is basically a huge router on its side and sounds like one.but louder. The top three included the DEWALT 735X, Triton TPT125 and the Delta 22-590. It points to the much more powerful motor in that unit. However, we did provide information from that category as we feel its valuable to some readers. neweek planer raboteuse cepilladoras electricas tradewheel
We applied blue chalk to the surface to highlight the milling marks, and scallops, for a visual inspection. Be aware that there is a difference between a vacuum with filtration to capture fines and one that moves enough air to collect them from the tool. Excellent job! The DEWALT DW735X was by far the best finish of all the samples we planed. Maybe one day well do an update an include them.
The wood samples we used in this test were 14 Mahogany decking, 1 x 8 Poplar, 16 Oak and 16 Maple. Hey Jim & Todd, Although I do not have the need to move my DW735x from one site to another, I have mounted it on a plywood rolling flip top cart which allows me to use either the planer or my Ridgid Oscillating Sander which are both housed in that same cart. asist hoblovka protahem cz b26r euronics 254mm Eric Theres just no way for us to realistically do that. | Disclaimer & Privacy Policy Tool Box Buzz is a Trademark of Tool Box Buzz, LLC Visit Our Partner Sites. Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. It appears that all these units are equipped with 15 Amp, 110/120V single phase motors and the graph clearly indicates that some of them are going into high over load, particularly the DW735 at continuous 213% for the time it was dealing with the poplar. Am I right that all of the testing that you presented used the faster feed rate so that you could compare apples to apples between the brands? Would be interested on how the planner below would rank in your test, King Canada KC-13HPC 13 Planer with Helical Cutter Head $699.99 Amazon.ca. Julian Thanks for the nice compliment and for taking the time to post a comment. This wasnt a surprise to us as several of us have used this planer for quite some time and its really the best benchtop thickness planer on the market without a doubt.
Luke, Im a hobbyist on the threshold of making it (furniture building) a job. I have searched and do not see any images online that represent the one you worked with. A lot of good information, succinctly presented. Im not affiliated with them. You need a bunch of passes compared to a stationary planer, but that is true for all of the lunch box planers. David W. planer benchtop thickness power inch powertec tools delta Jim Ive only seen guys store them in the trailer and carry them and set them on a work table at the job. Hi Todd, I was referring to your chart showing the ammeter readings: https://www.toolboxbuzz.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Planer-Amp-Readings.png. You might check to see if thats correct as its likely true for the 735x as well. Bench-top thickness planers have a dial used to move the cutting heads up and down to set the depth of cut. Our team set up a FLUKE 3001 FC recording ammeter that measured values on a one second interval and sent the data via wireless link to our computer for later analysis. Here we are again trying to rank the tools in our Head-to-Head and give you a winner. That means a dedicated cart for it, and that means giving up a signif bit of floorspace in a crowded shop, for a machine that gets very occasional use.
For additional information please visit our additional disclosure policies. I noticed that Dewalt makes no differentiation in setup between hardwood and softwood. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. Just curious, since the Triton rated higher than the Dewalt 734, why do you consider the Dewalt a better planer? We also wanted to see how the different hardwoods would exercise the planer capacity. During this test, we set each planer to its maximum depth of cut (as recommended by the manufacturer) usually 3/32 inch. I reached out to their support and clarified the warranty terms. . Dewalt definitely has the thickness planner worth getting right now. My advice, you can run a 12 through on each side, at the same time, to truly see paralleladiggity to the platen. While ranking the warranties might seem simple, weve decided to just list them rather than rank them. Am I missing something? I use this with my Dewalt 735 (to tie to the discussion here) and a 14 bandsaw. The reality is a user might change blades once or twice a year (twice would be heavy use) so the difference from 11 to 25 doesnt seem enough to warrant why you might buy one over another model. Some choose to participate, some do not. thicknesser planer It is very well thought out and informative and provides me a good basis to compare between planers. My space is multi-functional and has to be setup each time to work. Best of all, you provided us with the results so that we can decide what priorities to assess our purchase with. To do this, we adjusted each planers depth until it contacted the wood but had not reached the depth where the cutter blades hit the wood. To me the amp trace says to reduce the cut depth a bit to bring the amp loads down, particularly if you do experience an overload. wen planer thickness benchtop blade inch zoom planers bench wood thicknesser portable planer bench blades 1500w lumberjack 240v It has 12 wheels and can be easily set up and taken down by one person. Were those amps on the y-axis? planer This is likely attributed to the powerful motor and excellent blades. . Coming in 2nd place was the Triton TPT125 followed by the Ridgid R4331 in third place. This just gives a good relative comparison of how the motors performed under load. planer 1500w cepillo 1800w vevor 15a mophorn benchtop 15amp 5inch regrueso einhell planers 2pcs machineatlas
Same Question, except Ridgid v. Dewalt 734. However, with all the planers having relatively the same amount of snipe were not ranking this category either but rather letting you see how they all compared. We also evaluated the smoothness by simply feeling the surfaces. grizzly planer benchtop dust industrial planers built announce excited inch I have spectacular results with the Dewalt 735. Another consideration when evaluating bench-top thickness planer performance is the surface finish.
The DEWALT DW735X came in second with just over 4 one-thousandths of an inch followed by Ridgid R4331 at just over 5 one-thousandths of an inch. Did you test whether the planers, especially the 735x can actually handle the full widths they claim? Hi Todd, In my initial comments about my DW735, I failed to mention that I purchased as a used unit. The real question will be do you have a separate dedicated circuit, because if you run this on the same circuit as your dust collection Im certain that will be a problem. The length of snipe on all the models we tested nearly mimic this distance. For our testing we chose the following planers (follow links for manufacturers page on each planer): For this head-to-head test we focused on planing several different wood species, the surface finish, the power, and pricing. Sean Have to look VERY closely at the RIDGID warranty website, different tools have different coverages.
Youll need to evaluate the details to determine whether it meets your needs. In my case, I installed a 20A 240V circuit and purchased a Gyro Air G700 as it fit in a small space. In my circumstance, where this is a hobby and Im not churning out large amounts of wood here, will the benefits of the 735 be as pronounced over the 734? For more information, check out our, https://www.ridgid.com/us/en/3-year-limited-warranty, https://www.toolboxbuzz.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Planer-Amp-Readings.png. What did surprise us was the 2nd and 3rd place finishes of the Triton TPT125 and the Ridgid R4331. One thing about this collector: The impeller is at the inlet, ahead of any cyclone, so make sure never to use it as a floor collector or in other situations where I might suck up chunks rather than dust. While all the planers produced a smooth finish to the touch, there was quite a variation of smoothness resulting from the milling marks and scallops. there was some solid objectivity in evaluating the tool. Good luck. High amp overload and heat are not good for electric motors. Just has a better fit and finish. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. Peter. I havent ever tripped it on a dedicated 20 amp circuit. With planers I always try to take small bites regardless of the wood species, and see how the planer reacts. Do you have any idea how the DeWalt could actually operate at that load without tripping a 20A 120V circuit? Oh, and I dont usually use the fine setting on the Dewalt.
The power difference was clear during the planing operations as it didnt seem to care what we ran through it. Copyright 2009-2022 Tool Box Buzz, LLC All Rights Reserved. We didnt try to max out width, but I can tell you from my own experience with the 735x that it does very well even on wider boards. But every machine is capable of planing boards 12 to 13 inches wide and 6 inches tall. Many of the products that we review are provided to us for free by a manufacturer or retailer. The DEWALT 735X and the Triton TPT125 were able to keep the feed rate much closer to the no-load rate compared to the rest of the field. My Hilt shows its a 9A vacuum rated at 20A with a tool, which gives 11A to a tool before exceeding the 20A capacity. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. Do you have an opinion on the JET brand of portable planers? Clearly the heavier machines have heavier parts, likely has less vibration resulting in a better user experience. I already knew that the DW735 is a good machine, but you pointed out some features that make me more comfortable with my decision. I think speed 2 should be not used in testing procedure. These cookies do not store any personal information. Weight and size are always an important factor in small shops. The Makita is a very well-built planer with some nice features but the price wasnt as competitive and the surface finish, at least on the materials we tested, wasnt nearly as good as some of the other models. The graphic above shows the no-load feed rate for each machine along with the feed rates of each machine for each sample of wood. planer alitools thicknesser Ed The test was performed on the higher speed. I do have some JET tools in my woodshop and they are very nice. I am about to purchase the DEWALT DW735X, as you mentioned. What are you running for dust collection? Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. Im a newbie setting up my shop and Im trying to stretch my dollars. Thickness planers produce high volumes of wood chips and dust, probably more so than most any other tool in the woodshop. Luke, my situation is similar. Your own testing rated the Triton better. Between the milling marks and scallops the board could require more or less sanding to create a finished surface that will take paint, stain or clear finish well. planer benchtop planers Nice review. Question were all depth of cut settings for each machine the same for each specified material (was each machine doing an equivalent amount of work) . As you can see above the times required to change the blades on the planers varied from just over 11 minutes to just over 25 minutes. planer I appreciate you guys noting that weight issue. For each planer, we ran this test three times and used the average of these times for a comparison between the no-load and fully loaded feed rates of each machine. In some cases, we also have advertising or affiliate relationships with manufacturers and retailers of products and services we review. I would argue fit and finish is huge, and its not something that shows up when looking at general specs. neweek tradewheel Is it easy or difficult to change out the blades on any given machine? Hey Todd, is there anyone out there who has a good field set up for the 735X? Certainly could reduce that amp draw with a thinner cut, but in that test we were purposely putting all the planers on a high demand application by taking the thickest cut they recommend. Thanks! I am seeking a planer and since it will end up in an off-grid location powered by solar and generator for long jobs, the power requirements are important. If youre looking for a good performing affordable planer the Triton is certainly worth noting. The as-shipped accuracy of the tables varied between the different models.We adjusted the in-feed and out-feed tables separately and then checked for level across the entire machine. I ask because it seems that your personal recommendations do not necessarily align with the score rankings. It is like the feed rollers become to stiff. Anyway, hope this helps. I cant personally speak for it. We tested how much material would be lost to snipe. As a result of the rotational blade movement, small bite size chunks are removed as each blade contacts the surface, resulting in very slight ridges that can be left on the surface of the planed board (often referred to as milling marks). The power draw at this time was 32AX115VX0.85PF=3128W or 4.2HP. Below is a detailed discussion of our testing and evaluation. This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. In particular, we adjusted the in-feed and out-feed tables to ensure each were level with the planer bed. Its likely the #12 wire we used for the current tranformer probe, that probably should have been a #10 wire. PowerTools AirTools HandTools Measuring&Layout CordlessTools Automotive Lawn&Garden, Home Latest Tool Reviews Head-To-Head Best Benchtop Thickness Planer Head-to-Head, March 17, 2019By Todd Fratzel on Head-To-Head, Thickness Planer. So its possible some were cutting a deeper cut than others. We do not go back and add more tools. Users of the DEWALT DW735X will ultimately waste more material over the life of the planer. Thickness planers allow users to purchase a wider range of raw wood materials (often at cheaper prices) and mill the wood to the exact dimensions needed for a project. Ultimately, warranties can be a tough issue, and how easily you can get warranty service is likely to be as important as how many years the coverage is. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. We realize there is a value proposition that many will look at, but that will factor into our overall ranking when price and the other categories are combined. While we didnt rank dust collection its worth discussing briefly. Great comparison review, and I appreciate you sharing the differences for categories that you did not include in the scoring, because it lets us add those back in to see what the revised score would have been if the category was ranked, or we can assign weighting to certain categories and see the ranking change considerably as well. When you evaluated the price, it would have been nice if you had listed prices for replacement blades.
